| Criteria |
Exemplary |
Strong |
Acceptable |
Needs Improvement |
| Timely Discussion Contributions |
5-6 postings well distributed throughout the week. Demonstrates self-initiative |
4-6 Postings distributed throughout the week. Requires occasional prompting |
3-4 postings somewhat distributed. Limited initiative |
2-6 postings, not distributed throughout the week; rarely participates |
| Delivery/Relevance of Post |
Consistently posts topics related to discussion content, cites additional references related to topic |
Frequently posts topics that are related to discussion content. Post is supported by readings |
Occasionally posts off topic. Does not offer further insight into topic. Questionable relationship to readings |
Poor Spelling and/or grammar. Off topic post not evident that readings were understood &/or not incorporated into discussion. |
| Expression with the Post |
Expresses opinions and ideas in a clear manner. Post reflects that readings were understood and incorporated into response |
Ideas and opinions are stated clearly occasional lack of connection to topic. Post incorporates some readings |
Unclear connection to topic, minimal expression of ideas. States opinions without connection to readings |
Does not express ideas clearly. No connection to topic |
| Contribution to the Learning Community |
Frequently stimulates discussion, motivates group discussion through questioning. Presents creative approaches to topic |
Frequently encourages discussion to present relevant viewpoints. Interacts freely |
Occasionally makes meaningful reflection in group discussion. Marginal interactions with peers. |
Does not make an effort to participate in learning community. Does not any relevant ideas to topic |
Loading...